Friday, April 30, 2010

Mazdooro ki duniya me,

Mazdooro ki duniya me,
mazdooro ki koi kimat nahi,

mazdooro ki mazduri ka phal,
mujh jaisa tatha-kathit intellectual,
kha rahe, unki aakho ke samne,
thenga dikha ke,

Unki aapsi takrar,
mera bana unke,
sosan karne ka hathiyar,

1rs ka kaam kara ke,
chauani dene ka mujhe ,
mila adhikar,

ekta unse hai kosho dur,
Jis se mil sakta hai,
mazdooro ki duniya me,
mazduroko sahi kimat,

Mazdooro ki duniya me,
mazdooro ki koi kimat nahi,

by: Azad Sikander

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Innovative and Transparent Practices in NREGA

By: Sikander Kushwaha



Introduction
In August 2005, Parliament passed landmark legislation, the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (hereafter NREGA). The NREGA is a landmark in the terms of social and economical security legislation in India - or indeed, anywhere in the world - and promises to be a major tool in the struggle to secure the right to food and right to work. Initially it was launched in 200 backward district of India and later on it has been extended to all 604 districts of the country from 2nd April 2008. Under the NREGA, rural households have a legal right to get “not less than” 100 days of unskilled manual labour on public works in each financial year with minimum wage of the concerned state or at the rate as prescribed by the central Government. It has been renamed as Mahatma Gandhi Rural EmploymentGuarantee Act on 2nd October, 2009. 
 II. Main features of NREGA
v  Every household has the right to demand 100 days employment (unskilled manual work) from the Govt.
v   Employment (with Job Card) will be given within 15 days of application for work. Job Card (with photograph) should be with you. No one has the right to take it away. In case of lose you can apply for a new one.
v   If employment is not given within 15 days, daily unemployment allowance in cash will be paid by the State Govt.
v   Employment within 5 km radius of the village or beyond 5 km, extra wages of 10 per cent.
v  At least 1/3 of the employment will be given to the women.
v   Villagers themselves, not officials, will decide the works to be done.
v  There will be complete transparency and wages will be paid in full public view on weekly basis and not beyond a fortnight in any case.
v  No contractors and machineries are allowed under the scheme.
v  Working facilities like free medical treatment in case of injury and compensation in case of death or permanent disability of the laborers will be provided by the State Govt.
v  Social audit shall be conducted in full public view.
v  All accounts and records relating to the scheme will be available for public scrutiny.
III. Comparison with other schemes  
The NREGA has been one of the biggest programmes to combat rural poverty. Its legal guarantees have radically altered the relationship of the poor with the state. It guarantees for at least 100 days of employment to each house hold in a year. It is different from many other anti-poverty schemes of the government like National RuralEmployment Programme (NREP), Rural Landless Employment Guarantee (RLEG), Employment Assurance Scheme (EAS), Food for Work Programme (NFFWP), Sampoorna Gramin Rozgar Yojana (SGRY), Jawahar Gram Samridhi Yojana (JGSY),  etc that were in operation prior to the implementation of the NREGA. There were no transparency and safeguards in the earlier rural employment schemes. Documents were not available for public scrutiny. While in NREGA the transparency safeguards have been put in the form of social audit. At the same time the Act places an enforcement obligation on the state, and gives bargaining power to the labourers. There is another major difference between a scheme and an Act. Schemes may commence and can be easily shut down whereas Acts are more durable and to make changes in an Act, there is requirement of an amendment of the Honourable Parliament.
 IV. Challenges faced in NREGA
The NREGA is being closely monitored by various stakeholders, from policymakers to grassroots organisations time to time. Through media scan, sample survey, social audit research is carried out to assess itsimplementation on the ground. Various reports point out the areas in which the Act is lagging behind, and also about the areas where the efforts are visible and appreciated. Tanushree Sood Researcher with the Office of the Commissioners to the Supreme Court have point out following area where implementing body need to pay more attention.
 1. Registration of families
i. Definition of a household
The operational guidelines of the NREGA detail a household as a nuclear family comprising mother, father and their children. In addition, a household refers to a single-member family. Despite this explanation, there is still a lot of confusion about the definition of this critical term.
ii. Denial of registration
Media Reports from the field point to incidents of denial of registration to single-woman-headed households and physically challenged individuals. Discrimination based on caste has also been noted in some states like Gujarat. (http://www.righttofoodindia.org/rtowork/ega_articles.html)
 2. Distribution of job cards
According to data provided on the NREGA website (www.nrega.nic.in), maintained by the Ministry of Rural Development, the percentage of job cards issued to registered households varies across states.
i. Delay in distribution of job cards
The point of concern, however, is not just the percentage of issue of job cards but the percentage of distribution of job cards. Though job cards have been prepared across most states, in many states they have not reached the people, thereby restricting their right to demand work. A probable cause for this is the workload of the panchayat sevak who undertakes the task of distribution. On average, each sevak has two or three panchayats under him/her, thus making the task extremely difficult.

3. Applications for work and their receipt
i. Unsolicited fees being charged for work application forms
Fees for application forms are being charged in many states like Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Jharkhand. The fee ranges from Rs 5 to Rs 50 in some states. Forms are also sold openly in local markets or haats. This flouts the NREGA guidelines that state that applications may even be submitted to the gram panchayat on a plain piece of paper.
ii. Non-issuance of receipts
Another general problem noted in the villages is the absence of a system to issue receipts (pauthis) to applicants. This could be because of lack of awareness on the part of the panchayat sevak and the villagers. Receipts, however, are crucial as a proof of work demanded.

4. Implementation and supervision of NREGS works
i. Absence of worksite facilities
The NREGA provides for facilities for safe drinking water, shade for children, periods of rest and a first-aid box at the work site (Section 27, Schedule II of the NREGA). But a lot has to be done to ensure these facilities, the notable absence of which is a problem that cuts across states.
ii. Presence of contractors
Like in many other rural development programmes, contractors are increasingly becoming a threat to the NREGA. Though this may not be very apparent on the surface, private contractors are slowly finding their way into the system. The Act clearly states (Schedule I, Section 11), that no contractor is permitted in the implementation of these projects.
iii. Non-availability of muster rolls at the worksite
It is rare indeed to find muster rolls at the worksites. Reports from across NREGA districts show that kutcha muster rolls/attendance sheets are being maintained by people at the worksites. Rough notebooks and diaries are being used to mark attendance and make wage payments.
iv. Shortage of staff and delay in appointments
The Act’s launch was not accompanied by the appointment of additional staff for its implementation. This has resulted in the existing staff being burdened with additional work. At the panchayat level, the guidelines specifically advised the appointment of a ‘rozgar sevak’. Disappointingly, this has not yet been done.

5. Payment of wages
i. Delay in wage payments
Delays in wage payments have always been a matter of concern in previous employment programmes, and this issue continues to plague the NREGA. Wage payments are delayed for weeks, sometimes months. The time lag varies from state to state.
ii. Payment of less than the minimum wage
In many states, workers do not earn minimum wages. The reasons behind payment of less than the minimum wage vary.
iii. Non payment of unemployment allows
It is seen that unemployment allows has not paid by state in case of failure of providing job with in 15 days of demanded work by applicant.

V. Innovative and New Practices to overcome the Challenges faced by NREGA
As earlier mentioned NREGA is unique act which recognize the right to work as well as right to food of people. To bring transparency and accountability in this ambitious poverty alleviation act many innovative tools are being used and developed which are discussed as follows:-
i. Social Audits
According to Vision Foundation "Social Audit or Public Audit is a process in which, details of the resource, both Financial and non-financial, used by public agencies for development initiatives are shared with the people, often through a public platform. Social Audits allow people to enforce accountability and transparency, providing the ultimate users an opportunity to scrutinize development initiatives.” Section 17of NREGA act empower the Gram Shabha to monitor the execution with in the Gram Panchayat with regular basis. The Gram Panchayat should make available the entire document like muster roll, bills etc.  To bring it more effective and transparent government has amended the Act to give clear procedure for social audits which as follows:-
•       Social audits to be conducted once in six months
•       Prior planning and announcement of audit
•       DPC & PO responsible for audit (planning & availability of documents)
•       Formation of Social Audit Committee (workers & 1/3 women)
•       Documents made available 15 days prior to SAC for verification
•       Public representatives and concerned officials to attend
•       SAC to read out findings, ATR
•       Minutes recorded
The provision of social Audit in NREGA makes it pro- people act. People can know whether their money is utilised properly or not. At the same time through social audit people feels as an integral part of act. It a community based participatory approach and it helps in developing a community based ownership towards NREGA.
ii. Establishment of Ombudsman for redressal of grievance
On 7 September 2009 department of rural development passed an order to establishment of ombudsman for redressal of grievance in the time bound manner. Under this system Central government has given the order to each state to establish ombudsman in each district within three month from date of notification. The ombudsman will dispose all the cases within 15 days which have not carried technical question. Cases which have technical question will redress within 45days. State Nodal Department may include any other ground on which a complaint may be filed with the Ombudsman. This new innovative method of redressal of grievance may generate confidence on people. People may get optimum benefit out of this ambitious act.
iii. Mandatory Discloser
At the work site proactive discloser shall be through display of information through citizen information Board, work done and wage paid in the presence of worker at the end of the day by the person authorized. All information on NREGA will be placed in public domain through the website of NREGA as prescribed by government of India and be freely accessible to the people through the website .At the same time through Management Information System (MIS) all information like wage paid, amount disbursement, number of job cards issued etc would be updated and displayed at all India level covering approximately 2.5 lakh Gram Panchayats, 6465 Blocks, 619 Districts and 34 States & UTs.
iv. Financial Inclusion
Through amendment of sub section I of 29 (Feb. 2009), the payment of wage shall be made through the individual or joint saving accounts of the worker in the bank or post offices opened in accordance with the direction of Central Government.
v. Performance Feedback
Under this act there is provision of Statutory Mechanisms to give regular feedback to implementing body to improve the quality of implementation through:
•       Controller and Auditor General of India (Audit of 68 districts in 128 blocks and 513 GPs) 2006-07
•       Central Employment Guarantee Council
 Apart from statutory mechanism there is Internal Mechanisms of feedback which comprises of the following:-
•       Management Information System
•       Performance Review Meetings
•       Area Officers for field verifications
•       State, district, block level inspections
•       Help-lines, Complaints
There is also an External & Independent Mechanisms of giving feed back to the implementing agency which is as follows:-
•       National Level Monitors like Centre for Governance and Accountability etc
•       Studies commissioned in 2006-07  and in 2007-08
•       Professional Institutional Network
vi. NREGA with UIDA
NREGA in partnership with Unique Identification Development Authority of India (UIDA) has been initiated. The database of NREGA will be utilized by the UID Authority to expedite the development of the identification system for the residents.  
VI. Conclusion
NREGA is the most ambitious and pro people oriented scheme in the history of our country as well as in the world. The successful implementation of this Act would also be milestone message for both the developing as well as the under developed countries across the globe. With the passage of time there have been a lot of lessons being learnt through the implementation process of NREGA. Some of the challenges as mentioned above like the registration of families, distribution of the job cards, implementation and supervision of the activities under NREGA in itself in one of the biggest challenging task. To overcome these challenges some of the measures like Social Audit, Ombudsman, Mandatory Discloser of facts, Financial Inclusion, Performance feedback through external and internal mechanisms, NREGA and UIDA etc are some of the new and latest measures which would further strengthen the process of implementation of NREGA. 

Onion prices slashed for a State sponsored mass killing of farmer

By: Sikander Kushwaha


On Friday March 03, 2010 central government slashed the minimum export price (MEP) of onion to $225 per tone for all destinations. From March 1, the MEP will be $225 effective.

With the declaration of MEP slash the wholesale prices at Nashik, the hub of onion production, dipping from Rs 1,500 - Rs 1,600 per quintal prevailing a month back to Rs 500 - 550 per quintal.

According to a Financial Express analysis, retail prices of onion in Delhi have declined to Rs 20 per kg on Tuesday from Rs 24 per kg prevailed two months back. The decreases in prices have been significant in Chennai and Hyderabad where retail prices have gone down to Rs 14 per kg and Rs 13 per kg respectively on Tuesday from Rs 26 and Rs 21 reported in early January 2010.

In November 2009 suddenly prices of onion reached to his highest price Rs 32 per kg from Rs 15 in retail market of Pune and in wholesale market it is between Rs 1500 to Rs 1600 due to heavy rain product was destroyed.

To check the price of onion government has increased the MEP from around $200 in April 2009 to around $550 in February 2010 instead of export ban. In this background farmers thought export price will not slashed hence many farmers grown onion in their field.

With the hope of better price farmer those who had in loss due to crop failure, sown onion in their field and did huge investment on loan from formal as well as non formal source of borrowing.

Ganesh Thorat resident of sirur village near to Pune, first time entered into the cultivation occupation, had taken loan of Rs 40,000 from money lender in the hope of good price of product. He was hopping that his product will sell at least RS 1200 per quintal and earns profit but now he is compel to sell his product at Rs 500-Rs 700 per quintals in Pune mandi with loss. 

Now he is not able to understand what to do. Whether repay the loan or feed his and dependent stomach. He has limited option of fresh loan to survive. More or less, same story with all the farmers of onion in this region.

Government had slashed the MEP on the pressure of exporter for their profit not to check the inflation. In last year when prices of onion started to increase, till that time business houses were purchased onion from market at low cost and in the name of crop failure they booked profit by selling at higher price up to Rs 32. 

Now once again onion started to arrive in the market, in the name of demand and supply law as well as inflation exporter and business house made pressure on government to slash the price of onion MEP, so that they can book their profit by purchase at low rate ad sell at higher rate.

According to me government is not interested to protect the common man interest. When prices of onion started rising in November why not stop the export instead of increasing MEP. According to NAFED Onion were exported amounted Rs.504.20 crores in last year and inflation of food item reached to highest 17.95 highest in 20 year.

When that time government does not ban the export of onion then why this time reduced the price of MEP? I feelgovernment is in favor broker and allowing them to book their profit at the cost of farmer suicide. With the passage of time illusion of common men will be clear, decreased price of onion in domestic market once again sold at higher price. 

In this pricing game Again many broker or business house will earned profit and many farmer may lose their life. In this context I must say “suicide committed by farmer is not suicide; this is like a state sponsored farmers killing”.

Half Population in decision making via women reservation Bill

By: Sikander Kushwaha


March 9, 2010 become a historic day for Indian women when Women reservation bill has crossed one hurdle, after it is passed in Rajya Sabha (upper house of Indian parliament) with 186 votes against one in house of 243 voting member remain either boycotted or not participated in voting.

After long journey of 14 year women reservation bill is tabled in Rajye Sabha under UPA led government and passed with the support of BJP, Left and others, while Samajwadi Party, Bahujan Samaj Party, Shive Shena, Trimul congress party and others are opposed. At the same time seven members of Rajya Sabha belonging to SP, RJD, LJP and an unattached MP were suspended on Tuesday for remaining part of the Budget session for their unruly behaviour in the House on Monday over the Women's Reservation Bill.

33.3 percent seat of total seat will be reserved for the women in parliament as well as state assembly after enforcement of thisbill. Reserved seats will be determined by a separate law like the delimitation act. Still UPA have to walk rough path to pass this bill from LOK Shabha (Lower house of parliament).

Major protesting member of Parliament (Mulayam & Lalu) are opposing this bill because current bill have not provision of sub-Quota for Dalit, OBC, Muslim etc, mean while they are demanding to add these Sub-Quota. These people are fear that representation of upper cast increase and voice of marginalized will be suppressed. At the same time their seat may be in danger.

At first glance their argument sounds good but other side it creates suspicion on their spirit of giving reservation to women in parliament and state legislative assembly because their stars are in dark. Their cast politics is not working in their states. People want development in both the frontier social as well as economic.  Representation of Women in decision making is the best parameter of social development.

As we know that recently Mulayamji daughter-in-law had loss the election againt Raj Baber, if this seat is reserved for women specially OBC, Dalit then must be this seat went in favor of his daughter in law (Dimple Yadav) due to lack of close competitor. In the same manner Laluji and others also want such kind privilege to become indirect decision maker via their wife or relative incase of announcement of women reserved constituency.

According to me no one (men) wants to give right to women. After all in paternalism society women are treated as slave (material) and no one want to lose free labour.  In same manner all the opposing member do not want to give their rights. Why not these people this question to women? And support to the need of hour (womenreservation bill) which is the first stair to move forward.

I must thanks to UPA government who at least tries to bring this bill in upper house of parliament which is addressing the demand of the hour. Till now wait to raise their demand for sub-quata from their mouth. Let’s make them empower to raise their rights of sub quata. And I am hopping with the passage of time as all section of women will empower they will demand further for sub reservation.

Source:http://www.mynews.in/News/Half_Population_in_decision_making_via_women_reservation_Bill_N40261.html

Expectation of slash in food items price by hiking fertilizer price

By: Sikander Kushwaha


Recently two news related to food items is in headlines of media which will affect the majority of our citizens. First was that, Last ended week February 16, food inflationalmost hit 18 percent on the basis of India’s whole sale prices index. As per official figures of the Commerce Ministry, the annual rise in the price index for food articles was 17.94 per centfor the previous week periods. Food inflation raised continually fourth consecutive week despite of assurances from thegovernment that food prices would soon start coming down.

Prices of essential items continued to move up, with vegetables dearer by 20.93 percent, potatoes by 40.57percent, pulses by 41.24 percent and fruits by 10.39 percent over the 52-week period. After the release of these data government had once again assured and shown confidence that price of food price will go down.

Second news was, on 18th February finally government had given the green signal to increasing urea prices by 10per cent and allowed manufacturers to fix retail rates of di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) and muriate of potash (MOP), and 10 other complex fertilizers. The new prices will take effect from 1st day of April. The new policy has adopted on the basis of recommendations made by a ministerial group and Fertiliser Association of India (FAI).

One side government of India assuring to the citizens that in coming days price of food item will go down after the harvesting of Ravi crop, on the other hand government is deregulating the price of fertilizers, and allowed companies to hike price by 10% . Now Urea is sold at Rs 483, DAP at Rs 935 and MOP at Rs 445.50 a quintal. From April 1, it will be available at Rs 531.30. In case there is a 5 per cent increase in potassic and phosphatic fertilisers, the price of DAP will go up to Rs 981.75 and that of MOP to Rs 467.97.  



As we know that correlation between prices of urea and price of food item is positive, then how government is expecting prices of food item will slashed down. I feel government do not serious about this matter, and only want to provide profits to the firms (Tata Chemicals, Deepak Fertilisers, Chambal Fertilisers, Zuari Industries as also the government-owned National Fertilizers, Rastriya Chemicals & Fertilisers, Gujarat Narmada Fertilisers Corporation and Gujarat State Fertilisers Corporation.) at the cost of millions of farmer and citizens.

It is correct that government should reduce the subsidy to make farmer and Indian agriculture competitive in WTO regime but is it right time/way to take such kind of anti people decision? Our farmer are all ready over burden with several problems, another burden compel them to suicide. Hence we can not expect from them to sell their product at lower cost.

Lastly I must predict that in near future we are going to face harder inflation then now if government do not take necessary action immediately to check the food lead inflation.

Valentine day should be observed as National Condom day

By: Sikander Kushwaha


FEW CELEBRATIONS are popular in the most of countries of the world. Valentine Day is one of them. This day has become synonymous with expressing love. It is traditionally a day on which lovers express their love for each other by presenting flowers, offering confectionery and sharing gifts and greeting cards.
 
This holiday is named after one of the early Christian martyrs named Valentine and was established by Pope Gelasius-I in 496 AD. In 1990’s Valentine Day came to India with liberalisation. It is heartily welcomed by the young generation, however, strongly opposed by the fundamentalist groups of our nation. This is because one party got the chance to get out of taboo and other parties fear to lose the control over society which in turn decreases their value in society.

However, it is a fact that although the fundamentalists oppose this Western festival of love, our radical society is accepting it rapidly. We can easily understand its popularity by the demand of greeting cards, flowers, gift and the rush to buy them. 
 
There are various ways of looking at love, for instance, some people look at it as an emotional tie-up, some people look at it as fulfillment of physical need, some people look at it as spiritual satisfaction and many more. But according to me, love is a balance of emotional and physical needs and love is not complete without either aspects.
 
Valentine’s Day gives us as an opportunity to express love and talk about sex as well as associated components like safe sex, sexual transmitted disease, HIV/AIDS. There is an estimate 2.5 million people infected with HIV in India and the number is increasing every year.
I would like to suggest to the fundamentalist groups like Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Shiva Sena etc to grab this opportunity to spread the awareness about STD, HIV/AIDS and at the same time I would appeal and recommend to the government to observe National Condom Day also on Valentine’s day because awareness of this day’s relevance is spreading rapidly to every corner of our nation.
 
The promotion of use of condoms can hinder the spread STD and HIV/AIDS and save the lives of people who are dying due to lack of awareness about the dangers of these diseases.
 
Valentine’s Day has reached most parts of India, people might be not aware about AIDS Day celebrated on December 1, but they are aware about the Valentine’s Day, hence observation of National Condom Day on Valentine’s day would be give great impact to reduce the deaths due to unprotected sex.

Is Sena fighting for Mumbai and Marathis or for itself?

BY: Sikander Kushwaha


MUMBAI-THE land of 14 million people with diverse culture, the land of finance which contributes 5 percent of total GDP of nation, the land hope, dream, aspiration, glamour. Mumbai is the land of a means of livelihood. 

Mumbai is the land of terror, the land of the under world, the land of poverty. Mumbai is the land of slums. Mumbai in all its glory!

These diverse characteristic makes Mumbai the hub of news which attracts headlines of all forms of news medium and Mumbai always in the news. It is also very difficult to keep Mumbai from becoming the news headline for long due to its diversity. 

In the past few days Mumbai was in news due to statements of some well known persons. (Shah Rukh Khan’s statement on IPL and his offer to take Pakistani player in his team and Mumbai being called Bombay by Rahul Gandhi) and the reaction of the so called Senas (MNS and Shiv Sena) activist. Moreover, in the next few days, Mumbai will be in headlines due to the release of Shah Rukh Khan’s most awaited film ‘MY NAME IS KHAN’ and the protest of the Senas (Shivsena and MNS).

Prior to these incidents, Mumbai was in the news due to Sena (Shiva and MNS) activists’ act. The way of protesting by the Senas like: beating north Indians and south Indians in Mumbai, cancellation of examination, protesting to players, destroying public as well as private property. In few words we can say law has been taken by the Senas in their pocket. 

Now the question arises, what are the Senas trying to prove with these kinds of rubbish acts. These acts prove them as open militants and they are not less then militants who kill the people and humiliate them.

Sena always portrays themselves as a well-wisher of Marathi and Mumbai belongs to them. But do they ever think about the real resident of Bombay, the fishermen, koli and other tribes? Then how can they claim, they are fighting for Marathi manus. Actually they are trying to earn their livelihood in the name of Sena because these people also do not belong to Mumbai. They are also outsiders.

Both the Senas, on one hand claims that they are fighting to save the Hinduism, on the other hand they beat other Hindus mercilessly because they earn their livelihood with hard work of more then 16 hour a day.

In my opinion the Senas are actually spreading open terror, they threaten people and play with the Marathi people’s sentiment. And the state has given silent approval to take the law and order in their hands which is open violation of our constitution and the current state government does not have moral as well as constitutional right to be in government. 

Mumbai is for everybody and no one can stop me or any Indian from entering Mumbai.

Education at the cost of virginity: Where is the state?

By: Sikander Kushwaha


IT WAS an ancient Japanese tradition where a young Geisha's virginity was sought after, auctioned and highly paid for. But similar incidents in the 21st century have been making headlines the world over. Recently a 19-year-old university student from New Zealand of has offered her virginity "by tender to the highest bidder" on the ineed.co.nz website which is based in Hamilton, where Waikato University has its headquarters. 

The most debated case of this kind is that of Natalie Dylan from San Diego, California, USA, who attracted the world media when she auctioned her virginity at $ 3.5 million to pay education fee in 2008. The idea came to her after her sister Avia, 23, got into prostitution for three weeks in order to fund her degree.

The trend is by no means a new one. Back in 2004 Reid, a student at Bristol Universitysold her virginity in an auction on the internet to avoid graduating from university with debts of $36,700. In 2009, Alina Percea, 18, sold off her virginity in a bid to pay for her computing degree although she fell far short of her target of £50,000. These are just the cases that have made news, many more girls unknown to us are engaging in sex related activities to fund their education. 

In this regard a study was conducted by Kingston University in southwest London in the year 2006 which revealed that more and more students are resorting to prostitution or other jobs in the sex industry to pay rising university tuition fees. 

I wish to raise the question to these developed nations of why a girl feels needs to sell her virginity to get higher education. Where is the state and why aren’t they fulfilling their role as providers of the basic rights of their citizens? Why does the government not come forward to facilitate the education of such students or at least make an effort to make higher education cheaper to the deserving. 

The developed nations who make claims to a better civilization than the societies of developing nations aren’t setting a very good example here. I appeal to the Indian government to keep education affordable for everyone, so that students here don’t have to resort to such acts. 

The woes of being an auto rickshaw passenger

By: Sikander Kushwaha


On Monday 4th January 2010,  I hired a auto rickshaw to go from Wadgaon to Pune station. But the rickshaw driver refused and said that he will take me up to Swargate. When questioned, he answered that a strike had been called by Rickshaw panchayat of Pune since  January 2.

During the journey I asked about the reason for the strike. He said that Rickshaw drivers have put forward various demands including that rickshaw services should get the status of public services and the rickshaw driver should be deemed a public servant. They also want the Re. 1 cut in the auto fare, which was imposed six months ago, to be withdrawn and that action against goods tempos, under section 190 (2) of the Motor Vehicle Act, should be stopped immediately.
On reaching Swargate I asked fare and he told me Rs. 99. I was surprised to learn that it costs Rs 99 for just 7-8 km. He showed me the meter and the rate card. I found both to be correct .But when calculated, the fare at the rate of Rs 8 for 8 km is Rs. 66 including base fare of Rs 10. I had no choice but to pay.
This incidence compels me to think whether their demands are genuine or not? This is not the first time and I am not the first person to face this problem. Why does the RTO accept their demands? They are demanding the status of public servant and on the other hand these very people engage in the manipulation of auto meters.
On reflection, I found that some of their demands are genuine. They could improve the status of their work as public service and the rickshaw driver should be deemed as public servant because they reduce the burden on public transportation as well as well as reach passengers to their destinations in a shorter time.
I do not agree with their demand of withdrawal of Rs. 1 per km when fuel price is reduced / stable. They put pressure on authorities to increase their fare with the increase of fuel price then why not take back the increased fare when the fuel price decreases.

Off course these people face many problems like bribes and extortion by to get licenses and official clearances, parking stand problems etc.
Still I strongly feel Rickshaw drivers should behave ethically and charge only the genuine fare from people instead of manipulating the meter to earn extra money. Just imagine the situation if people boycott (go on strike) the auto services, for their wrong fare and other means of earning. Rickshaw Panchayat should also think about this. After all common people are their customers and rickshaw panchayat should consider the people and teach their members ethics.

Now voting compulsary, negative votes in Gujarat polls

By: Sikander Kushwaha


VOTING IS now compulsory in Gujaratafter the state assembly on Saturday passed the landmark bill that also allows a negative vote.
 
The Gujarat Local Authorities Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2009 seeking to amend the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corp Act 1949, the GujaratMunicipalities Act, 1963 and the GujaratPanchayats Act 1993 was passed by the Assembly on Saturday, December 19, making Gujarat the first state in India that has made voting compulsory in elections to local bodies.
 
The new law has made voting compulsory in all seven municipal corporations, 159 municipalities, 26 district panchayats, 223 taluka panchayats and in 13,713 village panchayats of the state. There are many pros and cons of this act like what will be the consequences, if eligible voters do not cast their votes and the like.
 
Still, I strongly feel that citizen of Gujarat first time will get the chance to use the provision of which gives right to say ‘No Vote or Zero Vote’ and marginalized people will be maximum benefiter of this act. 
 
In the present scenario, candidates win the election with the support of only 10-20 per cent of the total population of concerned constituencies because a large majority of the people do not visit the polling booth. This act will empower the citizens of Gujarat to use their voting right as their duty. They can even reject the worst candidate.
 
The government of Gujarat also has to keep some fundamental point while framing the rules of this act to get the anticipated fruit like: how to monitor the voter list, how to deal with the migrants and feasibility of punishment.